Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availibility
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- Climate Abstract Generator
- Climate Abstract Generator
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
Email Subscription
Join 1,944 other subscribersRecent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…
Gleick’s Institute Admits That There Has Been No Sea Level Rise On The West Coast
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


What is the time frame for short and long term? These people are crazy.
Do we know if this Gleick himself or a minion?
And as for the short/term long term bit, who’s been shouting about a supposed acceleration in SLR since 1993.
Proper scientists tell you that such things should be looked at over 60 cycles or more.
LOL! That last tweet cracks me up! Ha!
Funny, but really there is no vertical motion on a strike slip fault. More fittingly it would be a dip-slip fault.
Typical of fear mongering at the Los Angeles Times’s (Jan 2011):
When I contacted the staff writer, he responded with:
There ya go — how our national media sources science – the NYT’s. LOL
“DPO Phases” dumb people overcome
Maybe he needs some education on PDO phase. Pacific Decadal Oscillation
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_decadal_oscillation
DPO is actually is a phase when a woman ovulates..lol
http://community.babycenter.com/post/a15678045/counting_your_dpo_luteal_phase
One has to admit it’s tempting to focus on imaginary problems than real problems in the world, as imaginary problems are usually easier to fix.
The bad thing about fixing imaginary problems is that you never know when you are successful. Fixing imaginary problems would keep you employed for a indeterminate time!
Wait a minute…
“Rising sea levels threaten US ports”.
Call Homeland Security. Those dip slips will be able to arrest them.
Must be a case of voluntary dyslexia . . as you got your h’s and t’s mixed up with l’s and p’s.
These people need to start signing legal documents that state if their predictions fail to come true on such and such a date then they forfeit all their assets and they lose their present jobs. if they are deceased then their heirs will lose everything they inherited from their lying parent.
Force them by law to have some serious skin in the game. I’ll bet the fearmongering will stop immediately.
Sea level in San Francisco is falling about 0.06 mms/year since 1980 (although it is rising at 1.4 mms/year since 1854).
GPS receivers indicate San Francisco is subsiding at 1.12 mms/year.
Actual sea level change then: between +0.29 mms/year to -1.18 mms/year [far off the +3.2 mms/year from the sea level satellites].
Maybe Gleick is in the wrong institute.
Scientists Find That Sea Level Rise Is Much Slower Than Expected…No Human Fingerprint – See more at: http://notrickszone.com/#sthash.WYSNZe1E.dpuf and http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2013/04/25/rate-of-sea-level-rise-is-controlled-by-natural-oscillations/ and many other newer papers casting Gleick contentions into doubt.