Western Arctic ice coverage is higher than 1981, and is almost back to “normal.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…
Reblogged this on Health Science Watch.
News just in.
“Arctic sea ice melting faster than expected, UN report finds”
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/4b1a2f64-2048-11e3-9a9a-00144feab7de.html#axzz2fNJQn0BE
Of course. Who expects ice to ever melt?
The latest decline started around 2002, so it is Bush’s fault!
Is it this western ice you think is more likely to stick around
and become multi-year ice?
Well, it’s not going to melt now is it?
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php
The rules have changed. Zhang says that ice forms in warm water now.
… as he desperately hangs on to his NSF gravy train.
Check out this load of language confusion caused by attempted spin.
Well the 1979 “minimum was reached despite cooler temperatures in some areas that slowed melting”! My point is that you get a yearly minimum whether is warmer or colder than ‘normal’. What is Suzanne Goldenberg’s point?
We could prevent summer minimums with a carbon tax.
Wow! Now i won’t feel guilty about putting an extra ice cube in my Martini.
And the weekly ice coverage for this same area jump right up to normal with all the new ice that formed.
http://ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca/prods/CVCSWCTWA/20130916180000_CVCSWCTWA_0007271337.gif
Same with the Historical weekly coverage graph. Right close to normal.
http://ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca/prods/CVCHDCTWA/20130916180000_CVCHDCTWA_0007271334.gif
Eastern Arctic doing quite well with a little above normal ice for this week.
http://ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca/prods/CVCHDCTEA/20130916180000_CVCHDCTEA_0007271344.gif
http://ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca/prods/CVCSWCTEA/20130916180000_CVCSWCTEA_0007271341.gif
The take home message appears to be that wind patterns affect area and extent. Another break-through for Climate Science….*
*But they don’t affect area and extent in the Arctic, which is impervious to changing wind patterns. in that region. In that part of the world only CO2 is melting sea ice. 🙂
Now the MSM say polair ice is melting, ships are using the Northeast Passage. There they find reality is somewhat different: http://barentsobserver.com/en/nature/2013/09/aid-comes-wrecked-northern-sea-route-tanker-13-09
In somewhat related news, Greenpeace took on the Russian coastguard……
http://en.ria.ru/russia/20130920/183600132/Greenpeace-Russia-Conflict-Grows-Into-Diplomatic-Spat-With-Guns.html
Greenpeace lost.