Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…
McKibben Math : Five Is Greater Than 1,200
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/against-100-year-flood.html
And why would Bill McKibben even think to include human deaths in his thought processes? Isn’t it enough that perhaps. maybe, conceivably, some poley bear in a zoo somewhere in Colorado was inconvenienced? Isn’t that possibility more important than mere human life?
It was very windy at my place last night and one of my pieces of garden furniture blew over. I classify this as a twice in a year event. However, it shifted and blew over in such a way that it knocked over a large pot plant. Considering the original distance from the garden furniture to the pot plant I’d probably classify this as a 1 in 100 year event. Possibly if I email Bill he could sexy it up and attribute it to extreme weather.
you’ve got to consider the age of your house…how long that area has been developed, etc
I say at least a 1/10,000
The keep pushing their narrative.
How about “They” ….
McKibben sure is a frequent twatter.
Everyone knows gun owners fired in the air and punctured the clouds, which caused the flooding.
The twittering twits tweeted and once twits tweet they move on to tweet again, and again, and again,…
Nor all thy Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a twit,
Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it
🙂
I’m sure he would notice the difference if his funding were as greatly reduced.
So what’s the “POWERFUL” link? I bet it comes with “multiple lines of evidence” and is very “robust”.
97% is a magic number. So apparently is 5.