CRUTEMV4 temperature anomalies at 67.5N 17.5E
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Recent Comments
Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV…
I normally agree with you, but in this case, your claim of “no change” clearly has an upward slope, so I don’t think that your claim is accurate in this case.
Noise.
The previous graph for Greenland has a downwards slope and I also wrote that off to noise.
Peter … tsk tsk … you call that a slope? Seriously? Did you pay any attention to the temperature itself? (ie: +/- 8C) .. that “slope” you are seeing isn’t even a fraction of the data error itself. Come on … perspective, perspective …
Steve —
Re-posted at Defending The Truth dot com.
This poster made an assertion. You might want to look at what he says:
http://defendingthetruth.com/current-events/29969-northern-norway-temps-no-change-80-years.html#post549855
I’ll gladly re-post an answer.
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/CRUTEM.4.2.0.0.anomalies.nc
Steve —
I cannot access this file, sorry.
It is a netcdf file with the entire CRUTEM4 database. That is the standard format for distributing weather and climate data. Just pass it on to the guy so he can become aware of the fact that he is out of league.
Passed it on.