http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.shtml?stnid=040-081
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.shtml?stnid=040-151
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.shtml?stnid=040-081
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.shtml?stnid=040-151
| Jeff L. on Analyzing The Western Water Cr… | |
| Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Approaching 100% I… | |
| Morgan Wright on Great Lakes Set Another Spring… | |
| gelcarrion0t on New Visitech Features | |
| saveenergy on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 | |
| gelcarrion0t on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014 | |
| gelcarrion0t on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast | |
| gelcarrion0t on Seventeen Years Of Fun | |
| Barbara Stockwell on Nuclear Safety In The US | |
| saveenergy on 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV… |
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.


Presumably still experiencing post glacial rebound.
That said, I’ve visited Narvik, an impressive fjord landscape.
It is surprising to maintain that large a rebound without some earthquakes in that area.
But…But…But You are cherry picking the data! If you use ONLY 2003-2005, you will see a very DANGEROUS rise in the sea level! you used ALL the data! How could you?